“Too Long… I’m Gone!” – What effect are commuting times having on key employee loyalty?

November 25th, 2009 | by Amy Edwards
As the global business community emerges from a worldwide downturn, managers’ thoughts are turning to how they can manage their organisations back into growth.  During the last eighteen months, many firms have been through a slimming exercise, identifying where jobs can be combined or roles eliminated without impairing the business.  As a result, many commentators have focused their observations on rising unemployment as one of the key factors damaging the global economy, and pointing to any drop-off in the rate of unemployment as a sure sign of recovery.  However, most businesses are well aware of how difficult it is to find staff with exactly the right skills combination, and how important it is to retain those skilled key workers.
Across the recent economic slow period, people with the most valuable skillsets largely did not join the ranks of the unemployed, or were rapidly snapped up by other employers.  In today’s ‘knowledge economy’, economic recovery and growth will be fuelled by retaining those productive skilled employees.
This short article reviews the worldwide issue of skills shortages, then offers new research evidence on the correlation between commuting time and the likelihood of key workers leaving their jobs.  These research findings highlight how important it is for business and management to review the flexibility of the working arrangements that they offer their valued employees at a time when firms desperately need all the key skills they can get to effect commercial recovery and steal a march on their competitors.
Skills Shortages
According to recent studies[1], the top five positions employers globally are having most trouble filling remain unchanged from 2008: skilled manual trades people, sales representatives, technicians, engineers and management/executives.
On a region by region basis, the skills shortage picture is broadly consistent across the world.  In the Americas, 36% of the region’s employers are having difficulty filling positions due to the lack of suitable talent available in their markets – an increase of eight percentage points over the previous year.  Interestingly Accounting & Finance has suddenly appeared as the third most difficult to position fill, having not previously appeared in the top ten[2].
Talent shortages in Asia Pacific mirror those of the rest of the world, with 32% of the region’s employers indicating they are having difficulty filling positions.
Across 17 EMEA countries – Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom – 25% of the region’s employers report having difficulty filling positions due to the lack of suitable talent.
Moments of amusement do occur when examining some of the detail of skills shortage.  For instance, according to the Office space UK serviced officesUK’s Immigration Work Permit Visa Services, the UK is experiencing a shortage of the following workers:
Civil engineers, geologists, chemical engineers, medical practitioners, dental practitioners, biochemists and pharmacists, secondary education maths/science teachers, social workers, nurses, engineering technicians, ballet dancers, orchestral musicians, a/v equipment operators, ship and hovercraft officers, welders, electricity transmission overhead line workers, skilled chefs, care assistants, skilled sheep shearers[3].
Of course, official statistics, resulting in the rather bizarre selection listed above, can only identify specific skills-shortage categories in so far as they fall into pre-defined categories.  Businesses across the globe are very aware that each industry has a range of key skills that are critical to commercial success, but will not make up sufficient overall volumes to appear in these official lists.
Reasons for Resignation
Why, then, do people leave their jobs, and what can be done to overcome points of dissatisfaction in order to retain them?  One American business growth specialist has identified a top-10 list (in no particular order) of why people quit their jobs.  Those top ten reasons are:
Lengthening of commute times
Being required to do the work of two or more people
Cutbacks on administrative help
A freeze on raises and promotions
Not being allowed to make decisions
Constant reorganisation
Unclear goals
Favouritism
Unfair promotions
Competition between departments[4]
Clearly, many of these factors can be addressed in order to improve employee retention.  One of the most significant factors in improving employees’ work-life balance is to be able to offer flexibility to work remotely, either in whole or in part.  Flexible workplace solutions are now available which allow corporations to offer employees the ability to work in whole or in part from home, have a hot-desk capability in multiple locations, call on meeting rooms or working facilities as needed as well as a host of other workplace possibilities.  There is currently very keen interest in such flexible solutions, as opposed to rigid commercial property leasehold arrangements, as many companies over the last two years have found themselves facing diminishing revenues and a smaller workforce, but no ability to flex their office cost commitments.  Equally, as commercial recovery gains momentum, firms are now looking for flexible solutions that allow them to grow very rapidly, especially in emerging economies.
Some companies have already embraced the benefits of flexible workplace solutions: Cisco Systems estimates a 25% increase in work productivity among telecommuters; Google reporting that they can attract higher-quality employees by taking the work to the talent and, Deloitte estimates a saving of $40 million through the reduction in employee turnover.
These benefits are emphasised by a report which states 84 of the ‘100 Best Companies to Work For’ allow employees to telecommute or work from home at least 20% of the time, and many offer a number of other work/life balance programs such as job sharing and compressed workweeks[5]. Industry pundits also agree with one pundit stating: “Virtual office workers are 10-20% more productive than they would be in permanent offices.[6]”
Flexible Working and Employee Retention – Proving the Connection
For a business, large or small, to depart from its traditional commercial property and workplace arrangements, further proof is needed of the correlation between length of commute and increased likelihood of employee defection.  To this end, Regus commissioned research amongst more than 11,000 businesses in 13 countries across the globe, in order to obtain hard data on the subject.
The research findings provide very strong evidence of the link between length of commute and likelihood of defection.  The overall figures show that almost one in every five respondents (18.5%) across the globe has seriously considered leaving their job in the last two years because their journey to work is too long.  In most countries, this proportion is in the 15-20% range.   However, the figure soars in India where one in every four people (25.1%) reports having considered leaving their job because of commuting time, rising to a staggering one in three in South Africa (31.6%) and China (31.7%).
An even stronger correlation between commuting times and likelihood of employee defection emerges when the statistics are focused on people who take an hour or more to travel to work.  On average, the proportion of one-hour-plus commuters who have seriously considered leaving their job in the last two year rises sharply to 39%, compared to the overall average of 19%.  Interestingly, a high proportion of these people express an elevated level of workplace satisfaction outside of the commuting time issue.  Therefore we can conclude that even though they like their job and have a happy and stimulating work environment, a long commuting time may cause an employee to leave a company despite otherwise high job satisfaction.
Conclusion
In summary, this latest evidence provides proof that commuting times have a disproportionately high influence on employee loyalty – across the globe.  Otherwise-happy and stimulated employees are much more likely to defect if they have a long commute, defined in this study as over one hour.  Even journeys of more than half an hour start to significantly affect the likelihood of people considering leaving their present job.
Flexible working practices, where employees are given the option to work part of their time from home, but can still gain access to flexible workplace solutions that offer hot desking, meeting rooms, office facilities and so on, are becoming more popular.  This is not only the case with smaller entrepreneurial firms, but also large multinational corporations, and indeed public sector organisations.
In a world where skills shortages are being experienced internationally, retaining key employees is becoming more and more important, especially as companies seek to accelerate their commercial recovery after a slow economic period.  We can therefore safely conclude that flexible working practices, along with the workplace solutions to support these practices, are likely to undergo significant growth in the next few years.
[1] Manpower, Annual survey reveals talent shortages continue despite current economic environment, 28 May 2009, Manpower’s 2009 Talent Shortage Survey Manpower surveyed nearly 39,000 employers across 33 countries and territories to gauge employers’ ability to find the talent they need.
[2] Ibid
[3] UK Skills Shortage List, 15 June 2009
[4] Business Know-How, Top-ten reasons why people quit their jobs, 2008
[5] Workforce.com, Workplace flexibility – a low cost benefit with high returns, 16 March 2009
[6] Franklin Becker, director of International Workplace Studies at Cornell University

This article has been submitted by Andy Birks, Regional Director at Regus.

As the global business community emerges from a worldwide downturn, managers’ thoughts are turning to how they can manage their organisations back into growth.  During the last eighteen months, many firms have been through a slimming exercise, identifying where jobs can be combined or roles eliminated without impairing the business.  As a result, many commentators have focused their observations on rising unemployment as one of the key factors damaging the global economy, and pointing to any drop-off in the rate of unemployment as a sure sign of recovery.  However, most businesses are well aware of how difficult it is to find staff with exactly the right skills combination, and how important it is to retain those skilled key workers.

Across the recent economic slow period, people with the most valuable skillsets largely did not join the ranks of the unemployed, or were rapidly snapped up by other employers.  In today’s ‘knowledge economy’, economic recovery and growth will be fuelled by retaining those productive skilled employees.

This short article reviews the worldwide issue of skills shortages, then offers new research evidence on the correlation between commuting time and the likelihood of key workers leaving their jobs.  These research findings highlight how important it is for business and management to review the flexibility of the working arrangements that they offer their valued employees at a time when firms desperately need all the key skills they can get to effect commercial recovery and steal a march on their competitors.

Skills Shortages

According to recent studies[1], the top five positions employers globally are having most trouble filling remain unchanged from 2008: skilled manual trades people, sales representatives, technicians, engineers and management/executives.

On a region by region basis, the skills shortage picture is broadly consistent across the world.  In the Americas, 36% of the region’s employers are having difficulty filling positions due to the lack of suitable talent available in their markets – an increase of eight percentage points over the previous year.  Interestingly Accounting & Finance has suddenly appeared as the third most difficult to position fill, having not previously appeared in the top ten[2].

Talent shortages in Asia Pacific mirror those of the rest of the world, with 32% of the region’s employers indicating they are having difficulty filling positions.

Across 17 EMEA countries – Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom – 25% of the region’s employers report having difficulty filling positions due to the lack of suitable talent.

Moments of amusement do occur when examining some of the detail of skills shortage.  For instance, according to the UK’s Immigration Work Permit Visa Services, the UK is experiencing a shortage of the following workers:

Civil engineers, geologists, chemical engineers, medical practitioners, dental practitioners, biochemists and pharmacists, secondary education maths/science teachers, social workers, nurses, engineering technicians, ballet dancers, orchestral musicians, a/v equipment operators, ship and hovercraft officers, welders, electricity transmission overhead line workers, skilled chefs, care assistants, skilled sheep shearers[3].

Of course, official statistics, resulting in the rather bizarre selection listed above, can only identify specific skills-shortage categories in so far as they fall into pre-defined categories.  Businesses across the globe are very aware that each industry has a range of key skills that are critical to commercial success, but will not make up sufficient overall volumes to appear in these official lists.

Reasons for Resignation

Why, then, do people leave their jobs, and what can be done to overcome points of dissatisfaction in order to retain them?  One American business growth specialist has identified a top-10 list (in no particular order) of why people quit their jobs.  Those top ten reasons are:

- Lengthening of commute times
-Being required to do the work of two or more people

- Cutbacks on administrative help
- A freeze on raises and promotions
- Not being allowed to make decisions
- Constant reorganisation
- Unclear goals
- Favouritism
- Unfair promotions
- Competition between departments[4]

Clearly, many of these factors can be addressed in order to improve employee retention.  One of the most significant factors in improving employees’ work-life balance is to be able to offer flexibility to work remotely, either in whole or in part.  Flexible workplace solutions are now available which allow corporations to offer employees the ability to work in whole or in part from home, have a hot-desk capability in multiple locations, call on meeting rooms or working facilities as needed as well as a host of other workplace possibilities.  There is currently very keen interest in such flexible solutions, as opposed to rigid commercial property leasehold arrangements, as many companies over the last two years have found themselves facing diminishing revenues and a smaller workforce, but no ability to flex their office cost commitments.  Equally, as commercial recovery gains momentum, firms are now looking for flexible solutions that allow them to grow very rapidly, especially in emerging economies.

Some companies have already embraced the benefits of flexible workplace solutions: Cisco Systems estimates a 25% increase in work productivity among telecommuters; Google reporting that they can attract higher-quality employees by taking the work to the talent and, Deloitte estimates a saving of $40 million through the reduction in employee turnover.

These benefits are emphasised by a report which states 84 of the ‘100 Best Companies to Work For’ allow employees to telecommute or work from home at least 20% of the time, and many offer a number of other work/life balance programs such as job sharing and compressed workweeks[5]. Industry pundits also agree with one pundit stating: “Virtual office workers are 10-20% more productive than they would be in permanent offices.[6]”


Flexible Working and Employee Retention – Proving the Connection

For a business, large or small, to depart from its traditional commercial property and workplace arrangements, further proof is needed of the correlation between length of commute and increased likelihood of employee defection.  To this end, Regus commissioned research amongst more than 11,000 businesses in 13 countries across the globe, in order to obtain hard data on the subject.

The research findings provide very strong evidence of the link between length of commute and likelihood of defection.  The overall figures show that almost one in every five respondents (18.5%) across the globe has seriously considered leaving their job in the last two years because their journey to work is too long.  In most countries, this proportion is in the 15-20% range.   However, the figure soars in India where one in every four people (25.1%) reports having considered leaving their job because of commuting time, rising to a staggering one in three in South Africa (31.6%) and China (31.7%).

Graph1

An even stronger correlation between commuting times and likelihood of employee defection emerges when the statistics are focused on people who take an hour or more to travel to work.  On average, the proportion of one-hour-plus commuters who have seriously considered leaving their job in the last two year rises sharply to 39%, compared to the overall average of 19%.  Interestingly, a high proportion of these people express an elevated level of workplace satisfaction outside of the commuting time issue.  Therefore we can conclude that even though they like their job and have a happy and stimulating work environment, a long commuting time may cause an employee to leave a company despite otherwise high job satisfaction.Graph2

Conclusion

In summary, this latest evidence provides proof that commuting times have a disproportionately high influence on employee loyalty – across the globe.  Otherwise-happy and stimulated employees are much more likely to defect if they have a long commute, defined in this study as over one hour.  Even journeys of more than half an hour start to significantly affect the likelihood of people considering leaving their present job.

Flexible working practices, where employees are given the option to work part of their time from home, but can still gain access to flexible workplace solutions that offer hot desking, meeting rooms, office facilities and so on, are becoming more popular.  This is not only the case with smaller entrepreneurial firms, but also large multinational corporations, and indeed public sector organisations.

In a world where skills shortages are being experienced internationally, retaining key employees is becoming more and more important, especially as companies seek to accelerate their commercial recovery after a slow economic period.  We can therefore safely conclude that flexible working practices, along with the workplace solutions to support these practices, are likely to undergo significant growth in the next few years.

[1] Manpower, Annual survey reveals talent shortages continue despite current economic environment, 28 May 2009, Manpower’s 2009 Talent Shortage Survey Manpower surveyed nearly 39,000 employers across 33 countries and territories to gauge employers’ ability to find the talent they need.

[2] Ibid

[3] UK Skills Shortage List, 15 June 2009

[4] Business Know-How, Top-ten reasons why people quit their jobs, 2008

[5] Workforce.com, Workplace flexibility – a low cost benefit with high returns, 16 March 2009

[6] Franklin Becker, director of International Workplace Studies at Cornell University

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Choregus highly recommends our UK offices list, Hammersmith office space, Mayfair office space, Soho office space and Birmingham office space to rent.

  1. One Response to ““Too Long… I’m Gone!” – What effect are commuting times having on key employee loyalty?”

  2. By Anita Holmantz on Nov 25, 2009 | Reply

    When you use the phrase “labor shortage” or “skills shortage” you’re speaking in a sentence fragment. What you actually mean to say is: “There is a labor shortage at the salary level I’m willing to pay.” That statement is the correct phrase; the complete sentence and the intellectually honest statement.

    Some people speak about shortages as though they represent some absolute, readily identifiable lack of desirable services. Price is rarely accorded its proper importance in their discussion.

    If you start raising wages and improving working conditions, and continue doing so, you’ll solve your shortage and will have people lining up around the block to work for you even if you need to have huge piles of steaming manure hand-scooped on a blazing summer afternoon.

    Re: Shortage caused by employees retiring out of the workforce: With the majority of retirement accounts down about 50% or more, most people entering retirement age are working well into their sunset years. So, you won’t be getting a worker shortage anytime soon due to retirees exiting the workforce.

    Okay, fine. Some specialized jobs require training and/or certification, again, the solution is higher wages and improved benefits. People will self-fund their re-education so that they can enter the industry in a work-ready state. The attractive wages, working conditions and career prospects of technology during the 1980’s and 1990’s was a prime example of people’s willingness to self-fund their own career re-education.

    There is never enough of any good or service to satisfy all wants or desires. A buyer, or employer, must give up something to get something. They must pay the market price and forego whatever else he could have for the same price. The forces of supply and demand determine these prices — and the price of a skilled workman is no exception. The buyer can take it or leave it. However, those who choose to leave it (because of lack of funds or personal preference) must not cry shortage. The good is available at the market price. All goods and services are scarce, but scarcity and shortages are by no means synonymous. Scarcity is a regrettable and unavoidable fact.

    Shortages are purely a function of price. The only way in which a shortage has existed, or ever will exist, is in cases where the “going price” has been held below the market-clearing price.

Post a Comment